Back to Blogs

Every six months, someone announces that SEO is dead. 💀 They’ve been wrong the last twelve times and they’re still wrong now. What’s actually happening is more interesting, which is why nobody wants to write the more calmer version of the post.
AI search tools like :
Instead of typing a question into Google and clicking through a list of links, more users are typing the question into a chatbot and getting a synthesised answer.
Sometimes the answer cites sources. Sometimes it doesn’t. Either way, the click that used to go to a brand’s website often doesn’t happen anymore.
The user got their answer in the chat window and moved on. 📱
This is the shift, and it has a name nobody outside the industry has bothered learning. 😅

It’s the practice of making sure a brand’s content is the kind that AI tools pull from, summarise, and cite when answering relevant questions.
In plain language, GEO is about getting mentioned in the AI’s answer, even when nobody clicks through to find out more.
Now here’s the part the GEO consultants charging premium fees aren’t being honest about.
The fundamentals of getting picked up by AI search are largely the same fundamentals that make good SEO work:
If a brand has been doing those things well for years, the brand is already mostly doing GEO. There’s a small adjustment to make, and that’s it.
The brand still got:
…but there’s no traffic data to prove it.
This is uncomfortable for everyone whose job is reporting numbers up the chain. It’s also where the next two years of search marketing are going.

The first question to ask is whether AI search even matters for your specific business.
If most of the brand’s customers find them through:
…then GEO is not the top priority right now.
It’s worth keeping an eye on, but obsessing over it would be wasting energy that should go into the channels actually driving sales.
If the brand sells something customers research before buying, the calculation changes.
This includes:
These are categories where buyers are already asking AI tools things like:
💬 “what are the best content agencies in Bangalore for early-stage startups”
💬 “how do I evaluate a paediatric clinic in Perth”
💬 “what’s the difference between two skincare ingredients”
If a brand sells in any of these spaces, being part of those AI answers matters a lot.
For brands in that second group, a few practical things help.
The real-life ones people say out loud, in plain language, complete with the awkward phrasing. AI tools have gotten very good at matching natural-language queries with content written in natural language.
AI tools tend to favour content that demonstrates depth, specificity, and credibility.
AI tools parse structured content faster and cite it more often.
Mentions in:
AI tools triangulate trust across multiple sources, and being mentioned in three credible places matters more than having one perfectly optimised page.
And stop panicking about SEO dying. 😌

It hasn’t. It’s evolving, and the brands doing solid content work are going to be fine.
The brands stuffing keywords into thin pages with no real expertise behind them were already in trouble before AI search arrived.
AI search just made the trouble easier to see. 👀