Back to Blogs

There’s a counter-intuitive truth at the heart of most underperforming e-commerce stores.
The brand believes it’s adding value by offering more options.
The customer experiences those same options as a slow form of suffering.
On paper, every additional option increases the chance that something will be right for the customer.
In practice, every additional option also increases the chance the customer leaves without buying anything at all.
The science on this is settled and not especially flattering to how most brands design their stores. Human attention is finite.
Decision-making is metabolically expensive.
Each small choice the brain processes uses energy, and after a certain number of decisions, the brain starts defaulting to the easiest possible option.
The easiest possible option, for an overwhelmed shopper, is usually to close the tab.
Researchers set up a tasting booth in a supermarket with either 24 varieties or 6 varieties.
Foot traffic and conversion measure different things, and most e-commerce stores are designing for foot traffic while expecting conversion.
A customer lands on a moisturiser product page.
The brand has built what it considers a comprehensive product page.
The customer has been asked to make eleven decisions before they can buy something they came in already wanting. Most will hesitate, lose momentum, and drift away.
The decision the customer has to make is reduced to its essential form.
Do they want this product, yes or no. Everything else is removed, deferred, or hidden until after the core decision is made.
Every internal stakeholder wants their feature on the product page.
The packaging team wants size variants visible.
The sustainability team wants the eco-certification badge prominent.
The marketing team wants the
Each addition feels small. Together they ask the customer to make more decisions than they signed up for.
The same logic applies to
A brand that sells 200 SKUs across 12 categories will outsell one that sells 600 SKUs across 40 categories, assuming the product itself is comparable, because the smaller catalogue is easier to navigate and harder to abandon out of overwhelm.
Brands want to show every possible variant, demonstrate range and depth, prove that the catalogue is comprehensive.
Abundance has been confused with helpfulness, and customers can tell the difference.
Here’s what actually helps.
Default the obvious choice and let the customer override it if they want. Group products into clear use cases instead of expecting the customer to figure it out from scratch.
Replace the “all products” landing page with a “best for you” entry point that narrows the field before the customer has to think.
A well-curated e-commerce store feels like talking to a knowledgeable shop assistant who knows what to recommend, keeps the relevant options in front of the customer, and handles everything else in the background.
That kind of experience converts dramatically better than a sprawling catalogue, because it reduces options at exactly the moments the customer most needs reduction.
Once it’s noticed, it’s hard to unsee.
If the number is higher than five, the page is leaking conversions, and no amount of additional UX polish or ad spend will fix what fewer choices would have prevented in the first place.
More options feel like generosity. They are mostly friction wearing a friendlier name.